A couple of months ago, I got myself an H&K VP9 (chambered in 9mm) and a Beretta 92FS (also chambered in 9mm).
First off, the VP9 shoots excellently. I’ve fired about 400 rounds through it, and I’ve had no misfires or any issues whatsoever. It feels good in the hand, and the ergonomics of the grip fit beautifully in my large hands. I’ve also gotten more accurate with it too, unlike some handguns that one has to more or less ‘warm up’ to. The VP9 has a great trigger reset, and the trigger itself is pretty darn smooth. It may not be as light and crisp as the Walther PPQ (which is considered by many gun enthusiasts to be the best trigger straight out of the box), but I’m not particularly bothered by it.
Seriously, I have nothing but praise for this sidearm. I wouldn’t say it’s my favorite, but it’s definitely made a good impression on me. I still love my GLOCK 19 though. Man, is that an outstanding and reliable sidearm!
Also, and I’m over my problems with the Sig P320 and the Walter PPQ M2 which I had over a year ago (see my post, ‘I Love My GLOCK 19, But Somewhat Disappointed in My Walther PPQ and Sig P320’). The Sig P320, in fact, is really starting to catch my fancy as possibly serving as my primary concealed carry weapon. We shall see if it unseats my GLOCK 19 in this category.
Secondly, I carried many years ago a Beretta 92FS for duty use, so I was already familiar with it when I recently purchased it. A lot of guys used to rag on the Beretta when I was a cop, but I loved mine! Like the VP9, it also fit good in my hands. It was a slightly larger pistol than most used today which tend to be on the somewhat shorter and stockier side.
Either way, the Beretta was easy to clean and it was accurate too. I shot much better with that pistol than I ever did with my Smith & Wesson 686 (.357 magnum) and my Smith & Wesson 5906 (chambered in 9mm) which, in my opinion, were nothing more than boat anchors (yes, I’m being facetious!).
Isn’t that interesting? Why would an annotated version of Hitler’s Mein Kampf become a bestseller in Germany? I thought the entirety of the German people were pro-migrant? I thought they all supported Angela Merkel’s Islamic colonization efforts?
Well, apparently not. That Hitler’s political manifesto would become so popular among Germans tells me that they are starting to reconsider the man. Such an interest was more than likely spurred by the influx of so-called ‘refugees’ from middle eastern Muslim countries. It’s apparent that multiculturalists have overplayed their hand. They have caused the very thing they sought to eradicate – namely, a growing interest in German nationalism. Who better to consider reading over such bygone concerns than Adolf Hitler?
Please understand that I am not a neo-Nazi. I am not a follower of Hitler either, nor would I defend all that he said or all that he did (although I recognize there is another side contrary to our history books that tells a different story about the man). The point is that the German people, it appears, are reading Hitler’s work because they are looking for answers. They want to see for themselves what Hitler really said. They are starting to question what their Leftist overlords have told them about the ‘Fuehrer’ and the historical events which led to WW2.
A book you’re not supposed to read
I don’t think any of this is a coincidence. I also doubt that a growing interest in what Hitler had to say is just out of curiosity. With the presence of hordes of Muslim and African invaders spread throughout their land, the German people are starting to reconsider who they are. Questions of racial identity, including that of their future as Germans, are starting to fester.
By the way, this edition of Mein Kampf is titled “a critical edition” which means you’re not getting Hitler’s thoughts alone, but also the publishers’ input and politically-correct bias: “In an effort to highlight his propaganda and mistakes, the publishers spent years adding comments to Hitler’s original texts.”
It’s another case of liberals influencing what people think. They don’t trust you, the public, enough to make up your own mind about Hitler. They don’t think you can reach your own responsible conclusions over such matters. No, they’ll fill the entirety of both volumes with their “critical” comments so that at every point the reader is ‘redirected’ from sympathizing with Hitler’s “propaganda and mistakes.” You, dear reader, can’t be trusted with such ‘dangerous’ information. Hell, you might read it and go out and spark up the ovens!
Liberals in Germany may praise themselves for their ‘open-mindedness’ in allowing Hitler’s Mein Kampf to be republished, yet it is disingenuous at best. They will allow the man’s manifesto to only be read through the lens of their perspective. The comments in the edition, I can assure you, will not be limited to historical references and dates, but will contain a plethora of correctives to Hitler’s political worldview, especially his opinions of Jews.
That a painting depicting cops as pigs and gunning down Black people would hang in the U.S. Capitol shows not only the disrespect that people have for our nation’s police officers, but also shows how far this once great nation has declined.
During a saner age, the painting would not have been allowed to even enter the contest, let alone be selected as the winner. Cops were rightly seen as our protectors from criminals, and they were respected for it. Not so today. They are viewed by much of the public as thugs in uniform, violators of our civil rights, and as those who indiscriminately gun down innocent Blacks who ‘dindu nuffins.’
An array of paintings are selected each year to be displayed inside the U.S. Capitol and, apparently, this anti-cop painting was chosen by Rep. Lacy Clay (D-MO). In a recent press release, he expressed praise for the controversial painting: “Tonight, we are celebrating our sixteenth year of recognizing outstanding young artistic talent. As you can see from the artwork on display here, the level of talent is truly impressive. Your work is inspiring, and I encourage all of you to continue to develop your creative abilities.” Commenting on the piece later, Clay described it as the “most creative expression that I’ve witnessed over the last 16 years.”
Isn’t that special? What a wonderful human being. Clay is representative of the ‘enemies within,’ the core of race-baiting Leftists who intend to transform destroy this nation little-by-little, with one liberal policy after another until Utopia is realized we implode.
This is an interesting speech by rabbi Yosef Tzi ben Porat in which he admits that Hitler did not hate the Jews because they kept the Torah or because they observed Jewish customs, but because they orchestrated the death of 30 million innocent people during the Russian revolution of 1917. “The Russian revolution was made by the Jews. The Russian army was built by Trotsky,” he tells us. He went on to say that “In the first picture of the Russian government, out of 13 members, six were Jews. Who founded the KGB? Jews.”
The rabbi also concedes that Jews brought filth and immorality to much of Germany, polluting its essential Christian culture. Hitler, he admits, feared that what happened to Russia would also happen to Germany at the hands of Jews and, thus, he sought to oppose them.
From what I can gather from the rabbi’s speech, he too despises communists and communism. He’s intellectually honest enough to admit that his people played a major role in the spread of a destructive communist ideology throughout much of the world.
The rabbi tells us that our history books, written and influenced in large part by Jewish Leftists, will not tell people the true reason Hitler hated the Jews – namely, that they were “the forefathers of the Left, and the forefathers of Marxism, Communism and Hellenism.” He says these same Jews “destroyed all the values. Poisoned literature and theatre.”
Is not the rabbi correct in this? Who can reasonable disagree with him?
A book you’re not supposed to read
It appears the rabbi wishes to distance Torah-observant Jews like himself from those communist and atheistic Jews who have brought so much evil to the world. In a sense I agree with such distinctions. Not all Jews wish to flood Europe with hostile, non-assimilating non-Whites, nor do they seek the eradication of the White race. I have said so several times on my site.
Unfortunately, far too many Jews do not share the rabbi’s viewpoints. In fact, the majority of Jews are secular in their values (meaning liberal and atheistic) and not religious in the least. Whatever show they make of religion in the form of Judaism is merely cultural or part of their ethnic tradition.
The shared worldview among Jews in the West is liberal. Many of them, in fact, are aggressively Marxist in their orientation. The consensus among them is that any form of racial solidarity among Whites, any vestiges of racial consciousness among the indigenous people of Europe, is ‘racist’ in nature and must be challenged and uprooted. Jews worldwide feel it is their duty to uproot ‘racism’ wherever they find it, and their mission field is directed exclusively at White countries.
Another book you’re not supposed to read
The point is that while there are some ‘good’ Jews who harbor no ulterior motives against Whites (although Christianity is hated by almost all of them), the greater number of them see Whites as inherently bigoted and even anti-Semitic. Of course, it never occurs to them why so many Whites are distrustful of Jewish people. Like Blacks in America, it’s always someone else’s fault, never their own.
This alone should cause any race-conscious White person to forever jettison any hope that Jews and european Whites can live together peacefully and with mutual respect in the same land. Jews have proven too many times throughout history that they are bent on destroying our nations and our many cultures from within. Most of them, unfortunately, are against us. They are not for us, and never will be. We must never forget this when dealing with Jews.
The presence of some good and decent Black people should not compel us as Whites to imagine that a large population of Blacks will be good for us, so also the presence of some good and decent Jews should not compel us to think that our societies can tolerate large numbers of them. The greater majority of Blacks are dysfunctional and contribute little that is beneficial to our societies. The greater majority of Jews are subversive, they do not assimilate and, ultimately, they work ceaselessly for our downfall.
As I have said on previous occasions, I do not hate the Jews. I do not wish them any harm. I don’t want them removed from their land. They have a right to their land just as we do. They also have a right to espouse and defend their ethnicity, their religious traditions, and their culture just as we do. I just wish they would afford me and my people the same rights, instead of always doing all in their power to racially balkanize Europe, America and all of the West.
According to the description provided in Live Leak, “More than 12 kids/teens attack and rob 2 people: Is it the beggining of the zombie appocalipse? No, this is just Rio de Janeiro. This is normal around here. These kids simply won’t go to jail because they’re underage. Even when they kill people, they stay locked up for a maximum of 1 or 2 years if they’re caught.”
What this surveillance camera records is the fruits of forced ‘diversity.’ Its greatest impact will not be felt by the swarthy hordes of third-worlders, but by Whites who are not wealthy enough to be live behind private, gated communities with armed guards to protect them. The middle-class (if it even exists after liberals get through with them) and lower income Whites will suffer the most. They will be the ones forced daily to bear the burden of hostile and government-coddled non-Whites.
I hope that y’all have a wonderful new year. Thank you, again, for your support of this blog and the kinds of things I write about. I could do it without you but, seriously, it wouldn’t be nearly as fun!
Just as I thought. I’d like to take credit for being so insightful, but the truth is that it was easily predictable that Drexel University officials would not take any serious measures to either discipline or fire the professor who two weeks earlier made a series of “White genocide” remarks on Twitter.
Their choice to do nothing was grounded on “free speech, academic freedom, and the political content of his Tweet.” It’s another case of ‘free speech for me, but not for thee.’ If you think for a minute that university officials would have ruled the same had the professor tweeted the same things against Blacks or Hispanics, you’re living on another planet.
Liberals almost always get a pass for the racist and hateful things they publicly spew against Whites and conservatives because the gatekeepers who determine what is ‘hateful’ is comprised of Left-leaning politicians, academicians, and media elites. They will always favor their own, those who align with their fundamental belief system and values. Their dismay and scorn is reserved exclusively for White conservatives, especially race-conscious Whites who demand consistency from the-powers-that-be when Whites are racially maligned by ‘people of color.’
If you’ve ever wondered how ghetto culture influences Americans, especially our youngest and most impressionable, the children’s movie Sing is one such avenue in which secular values are conveyed to the masses. With cartoon characters singing rap lyrics and ‘twerking,’ the message promoted is that ghetto culture in the form of rap and hip-hop music is ‘cool’ and acceptable, something we should emulate as Whites. The assumption is that so long as cute cartoon characters sing and jiggle like Blacks, it’s okay.
But it’s not.
Seriously, what genuine good has such music and erotic tribal dancing in the form of ‘twerking’ produced for Blacks in America? None, I can assure you. Oh sure, I know that some Blacks have gained fame and fortune through such musical genres, but what virtue and beauty has it brought to America’s inner cities, not to mention Whites who feel it necessary to mimic Blacks? Has it really bettered us as a people? Has it uplifted our nation’s culture or made us more coarse and crude? If it has done little to improve the lives of Blacks, what good can we expect it to make on the lives of Whites?
Do our children really need to see ‘twerking’ rabbits? What kind of message does this send to our kids? What good does sexualized cartoon images do for our children? How will it not prep them for full acceptance of ghetto culture upon entering their teenage years?
Liberals know this all too well. They are quite cognizant that the way to break down any generation’s vestiges of patriotism, Christianity, traditionalism, and conservative thought is to target the children with their godless and hedonistic values – and this is precisely what liberals have been doing for the past 50 or so years!
In fairness, I have been told that Sing only features the rapping and ‘twerking’ in small dosages and it plays little force in the overall movie. Other musical genres are featured too. I haven’t seen the movie, but I suspect that it’s probably true. Still, what little role such rapping and ‘twerking’ plays in the movie is sufficient to convey its message to a young and impressionable audience.
Liberals, then, don’t need to bombard us with their values in order to ‘transform’ the greater culture (though, in many respects, this is what they often do). They only need to do so incrementally over a sustained period of time and it’s guaranteed to achieve the same result.
For Obama, it’s all about race or, more specifically, about displacing the greater White population and dominant White culture with non-Whites. Everything this man did was oriented toward breaking down America and moving it as far away as possible from it’s historic White and constitutional basis.
How naive for anyone to have believed that Obama would bring about a ‘post-racial’ America where race, ethnicity, and even one’s religion would no longer be given preference over others. Obama was counting on the average, low-information American voter to believe it, and he was apparently not disappointed in his efforts. All-the-while, however, he did everything in his power to undermine this once great nation and to create an America that more resembled his race (Black) and religious sympathies (Islam).
Obama was just as racist as any neo-Nazi. The difference is that while neo-Nazis are honest enough to admit what they believe, Obama, in contrast, concealed his racist, anti-White motives and schemes. He was craftier than any neo-Nazi by far, although only the most gullible couldn’t see what he was really aiming at.
Ironically (or perhaps not so?), Obama was trying to make America Black and Brown while we as race-conscious Whites are seeking to make it White again (or to at least preserve Whites as the dominant demographic). In this sense, I suppose, we are somewhat similar. Our goals are racially motivated. The point is, it’s natural and it comports with our tribal nature to want to be among our own kind, to form our societies and nations after people who reflect our race, our culture and our religious views.
I don’t fault Obama for this per se. I do, though, condemn his dishonesty in that he took upon himself an office in which he was required to represent all Americans and their general welfare but, instead, he pursued goals that would favor one racial group (Blacks) over Whites and which would favor one religion (Islam) over all others (mostly Christianity).
In light of this, don’t ever let anyone make you feel ashamed for wanting to make America White again, for promoting policies that preserve our racial and cultural heritage. Every racial and ethnic group throughout the world does the same, including our Kenyan-born dictator.
Here’s a short documentary from a few years back featuring Steven Otter, a man who lived among Blacks in South Africa as a means of breaking down racial prejudices. He was anti-Apartheid to the core, and he became somewhat of a celebrity for his ‘anti-racist’ public stunts. He was also a journalist who made it his mission to fight for ‘underprivileged’ Blacks (for the full story, see here).
Listen to how he dismisses the Whites who were surprised that he had chosen to live among South African Blacks in their own neighborhoods. His family and others had warned him about living among the “colored,” but he refused to listen. His response in the documentary is horrifically naive: “A lot of that fear is misperception. I don’t think it’s a reality.”
Well, Steven Otter finally got the very thing Whites had tried to warn him of. He was recently brutally stabbed in the face and chest during a robbery at his home by two Black male intruders. According to officials, “Two suspects fled the scene with a television set, a laptop computer and a cellular telephone, and are yet to be arrested.”
Steven Otter: Another foolish Libtard like Amy Biehl
He died in the arms of his partner, a fitting end for a Libtard who lacked the sense to recognize the danger he was in while living among the Dindus. His ignorance of human nature and the reality of inherent racial differences led him to engage in odd political stunts, including efforts to identify with Blacks who in large measure either thought he was strange or secretly hated him. Can you blame them? No one likes to be patronized or turned into some do-gooder’s social-poverty project, so it shouldn’t surprise us if we discovered that Otter, and those like him, are actually despised among South African Blacks.
This really is a feel-good story. We rejoice when White liberals feel the effects of their stupid life-decisions. It vindicates our message to them, and their need to break free from the multicultural myths they’ve been fed.
Although it would be nice to imagine that other White liberals will learn some lessons about race as a result of Steven Otter’s brutal death, it just isn’t going to happen. Liberals are too stupid. Like brainwashed cultists, they cannot and will not allow themselves to be persuaded of reality, of how things truly are in the dangerous world we live in. Nothing short of an intense intervention or a life-threatening ‘diversity encounter’ will change their ways – and even then there are no guarantees. The deception runs too deep.
Finally, I’d like to send Steven Otter on his way with a good old fashioned evil laugh. It’s a bittersweet kind of laugh, because while we think it’s funny that you suffered and died at the hands of the very people you naively thought you could ‘save,’ you definitely deserved it. You worked against your own people, your own race, and you promoted an ideology among us that has proven harmful to all future generations of Whites.
