Muslims are not the only plague that Europe faces. They also have the thieving and begging gypsies that have infested the continent. Here’s some store owners who decided to take matters into their own hands.
Richard Spencer was booted from CPAC yesterday even though he had been invited by organizers of the event. It was on first day of the conference that they realized they had invited a ‘Neo-Nazi’ which is, essentially, how everyone on the ‘Alt-Right’ is viewed by mainstream conservatives.
It’s another clear indication that while we as race-conscious Whites would agree with much of conservative ideology (low taxes, limited government, a strong military, traditional marriage roles, etc.), we are not really conservatives per se. We set ourselves apart from them because we recognize the importance of both race and culture. Today’s conservatives are race neutral, and are often just as militant in support of multiculturalism and the ‘diversity’ rainbow as liberals. Like those on the Left, they engage in virtue signaling to prove to others how ‘non-racist’ they are.
Conservatives hold exclusively to ‘propositional nation’ concepts at the exclusion of ‘blood and soil’ concepts. In other words, they see as American anyone who merely adheres to a set of propositional principles as set forth in the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution. Any race or ethnicity of people has a rightful claim to being an American so long as they intellectually adhere to these principles. They do not see Whites as unique or distinctive even though most people throughout the world equate an ‘American’ with being White. The same could be said for being ‘British’ or ‘Swedish.’
By the way, I’m not denying the value of propositional principles that help to define any nation or people, including those surrounding the founding of the United States. I’m only saying that these alone are not sufficient by themselves. An American is more than just a set of abstract concepts or principles, but must include ‘blood and soil,’ that is, matters of race and ancestry. Being an American, then, involves both a set of propositional beliefs and racial identity.
The nation’s founding stock and what race of people the Founders of our republic saw as the rightful heirs of what they established, according to the typical CPAC conservative, does not belong to Whites exclusively, but to anyone who merely accepts a set of abstract principles. This ‘American’ can be a Sub-Saharan African, Mexican, Asian and even middle-eastern Muslim.
This is how contemporary conservatives think, but it’s not how racially-conscious Whites think. I’m not saying that such non-Whites aren’t legally Americans, but only that racialist Whites do not see them as real or true Americans in light of what the Founders thought. John Jay echoed our sentiments in the second of The Federalist Papers when he gave thanks that “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs.”
Contrary to widespread belief, modern conservative views of race and what constitutes an American would be foreign ideas to our Founders, including the early citizenry of our once great nation. They did not even view Blacks as Americans, but as property. I’m not saying I agree with slavery or that Blacks should be seen as property, but only that the Founders were not inclined to view non-Whites as legitimate Americans. Only those of European and, especially, of British stock were seen as Americans.
Many early Americans, in fact, were even opposed to German and Irish immigration because though they were racially White, it was felt that they would not assimilate to American culture and our manner of life. If they held reservations about Germans and the Irish, do you seriously think they would have gladly received Africans, Asians, Mexicans and Muslims as being equally American? The answer should be obvious.
The native Indians scattered throughout the continent were also not viewed as Americans in spite of being called ‘Native Americans’ many years later. They were not historically seen as Americans in the more conventional sense because they were not citizens and did not see themselves as Americans nor did they call their land America. Their entire identity was wrapped up in their tribe of people. Even the name ‘America’ has a European etymology which derives from Amerigo Vespucci, an Italian explorer who explored the new continents in the years following Christopher Columbus’s great voyage in 1492.
CPAC’s leadership was wrong to have kicked Spencer out of their conference. They missed a great opportunity by not allowing him to address the convention or at least to talk freely to the folks inside.
In spite of many lessons they should have learned from Trump’s election against all odds, they apparently wish to return to being the party of graceful losers, of grinning monkeys instead of political reformers and fighters, and of being just a little to the right of Leftist democrats.
I commend Richard Spencer’s analysis and review of Milo Yiannopoulos’ recent downfall in which indefensible statements he made about pedophilia were revealed.
Though many have embraced Milo (mostly among those of the ‘Alt-Light’), I did not for a plethora of reasons. In my opinion, no White identity cause can long endure if it’s led by flamboyant personalities who are positive toward pedophilia or pederasty, who are inordinately effeminate, and who openly espouse homosexuality. Such perversions or moral deviancy are inherently destructive to the family structure and healthy marriages (man and woman) which is vital for the kinds of White societies we wish to have.
Any society we wish to create for our White posterity cannot be grounded on weak views of homosexuality, Transgenderism, and feminism. If the poison of modern liberalism or social-Marxism is permitted free reign and not resisted within any future White nation that we create, we will find ourselves fighting all of the same battles over again. Giving Leftist ideology any legitimacy in a future White ethnostate is equivalent to allowing hordes of non-Whites into our new country under the umbrella of ‘tolerance.’
Moreover, you’re just not going to attract to your cause the average American man and woman who were raised with Christian beliefs or who have a strong sense of right and wrong and of what is seen as normal. Most of them will be repelled by flamboyant and freakish Milo types who openly boast about how many Black cocks they’ve sucked. They will naturally reject any message coming from his cum-stained mouth no matter how truthful it may be.
This, more than anything, led me to reject Milo as any kind of leader of the ‘Alt-Right.’ In fairness, Milo never claimed to be a leader in the ‘Alt-Right’ movement, but many said he was and wanted him to take on a more visible role among ‘Alt-Righters.’ I’m glad he didn’t and his recent downfall proved I was right in rejecting him. By the way, I wasn’t the only one. Several White nationalists and ‘Alt-Righters’ were discerning enough to distance themselves from him.
For more on my opinions of Milo, see my post: “Milo Yiannopoulos sings the national anthem in drag: Is this our ‘Alt-Right’ leader? Is this who we are? Does this reflect our message of White identity?” (published 9/23/2016).
What you’re watching in this video is typical daily life throughout America’s fruited plains once Whitey is gone or, at least, when we become a very small minority. This is what a non-White America will look like, except it will be similar and multiple conflicts like this on steroids!
The presence of Whites with their advanced cultures, their natural civility, their ordered societies, and their ‘rule of law’ – which in many ways has a restraining effect on the lower races and ethnic groups – will be no more once the White man’s influences are gone.
Don’t let anyone fool you otherwise. Think of all those colonial nations that were once ruled by the White man. Where are they today? Have their societies improved or have they experienced great decline since Whites moved away? The answer should be obvious if we know our history and understand the reality of race differences.
According to the description provided in Live Leak, “IPRA has released several body cam videos from the November 28 shootout that injured two Chicago Police Officers. The suspect, identified as 36 year old Richard Grimes, fatally shot his pregnant girlfriend Ashley Williams, 24, in the stomach. Grimes left the scene but ran into officers responding in the first block of North Kenton, where he fired a handgun at the officers before running away. Grimes was spotted again in a gangway in the 4500 block of West Washington where he shot again, striking two officers causing injuries ‘consistent with a graze wound from a bullet.’ Officers returned fire, fatally striking him in the head and chest.”
Is this really so tragic? Is this a good ending or a bad one? What kind of children do you think these two would have spawned onto society? Do you seriously think their gutter seed would have been marked by civility and lawfulness? I think you know the answer.
Oh, and don’t forget that ‘Black Lives Matter.’
Richard Grimes: ‘He was such a good boy’
Ashley Williams: Known for her great choice in men
Los Angeles County used to be a beautiful place with relatively low crime. The dominant racial demographic was White – that is, until a gradual Mexican invasion beginning in the 1950s took root. Much of the county is now a cesspool of illegal immigrants from Mexico and a massive population of Mexican and El Salvadorian gang members.
East Los Angeles, much of the City of Los Angeles, and the nearby San Gabriel Valley survive as testimonies to what Mexicans bring to any country stupid enough to have them.
The point is not that all Mexicans are bad people. They’re not, and I have met several wonderful and hard-working Mexicans over the years. The problem is that far too many of them are low-IQ and low-skilled. They have, moreover, a strong propensity toward the gangster lifestyle, including widespread and severe levels of alcoholism, single motherhood, and street crime.
Mexicans yesteryear, Mexicans today
My words do not spring from someone who knows little about these people on a personal level. Instead, I have worked closely with Mexicans over many decades. I’ve been inside their homes more times than I wish to count. I’ve been to their parties, family gatherings, and even their funerals. I’ve worked daily in their barrios for years as a cop. I’ve had some very close Mexican friends beginning in the early 1970s. I know these people, and while I would never paint them as all bad without exception, the truth remains that in a matter of years they have the capacity to destroy every community they settle into.
If you wants lots of crime, graffiti, and gangsters roaming your streets, then by all means invite a bunch of Mexicans, Hondurans, and El Salvadorians into your neighborhood.
Whether we wish to accept it or not, Mexico does not give us their best, and those who arrive on our soil from Mexico and Central America have proven for the past sixty years just how disruptive and ruinous they become when they are tolerated. Do you seriously think for one minute that L.A. County would’ve been dubbed the ‘gang capital of the world’ had Whites not allowed so many Mexicans to dwell among us?
Mexicans do not belong in the U.S. They are not of us (Whites) and they never will be. They do not think the way we do. Their values are different. They belong in Mexico. That is their home. That is where their hearts are. Because we have allowed so many Mexicans to remain in the U.S., we see clearly what kind of trouble they bring. They have not made America a better place, but a worse place. We have lowered the value and quality of our country by allowing them to dwell among us.
It’s been a tragic mistake.
While I grant that Mexicans may not quite be the plague that Blacks have proven to be, they’re certainly a close second.
For those wanting more on this subject, I recommend two additional posts that I’ve published on this site: (1) ‘Has a massive population of Mexicans been good for L.A. County?’ (March 27, 2013), and (2) ‘What Mexicans bring to America’ (June 27, 2013).
I have my suspicions that these scenarios are genuine (the Dindus are probably paid for taking part in the messy stunts and signed some kind of contractual agreement). Regardless, they’re fun to watch, and who can deny that it doesn’t comport with the kinds of things Blacks routinely do?
This entire ‘instructional’ video of Black parents showing their kids how to deal with police during traffic stops is based on the premise that Blacks are unjustifiably targeted by officers. The prevailing assumption is that police officers arbitrarily beat up and arrest Blacks solely because of the color of their skin.
It’s another case of Blacks pushing the ‘victim’ narrative. The young Black kids in the video, like most gullible adult viewers, don’t even entertain the possibility that there might be another side to the story (which there always is). The perception of Blacks must somehow always be the correct one. Yet like most police shootings of Black men in America, the details almost always reveal something different than what’s claimed by family members.
How about that Black father who said he was placed in handcuffs in the mall, thrown to the ground, and Tasered. Do you really think that’s all there was to it? Or how about the Black mother who said she was arrested merely because the bumper was hanging off her car. Do you think there might be a little bit more about that story than she bothered to reveal?
One woman tells her daughter the not-so-surprising fact that police officers are just people who take their personal biases into their jobs. Even though law enforcement agencies try to weed out those with strong racial prejudices before hiring them, the fact remains that everyone, no matter what type of employment they may do, has prejudices and ‘taboo’ thinking which includes the Black parents in the video (do you seriously think the Black parents in the video don’t have politically-incorrect assumptions about others?). That by itself is not the problem. The real issue is whether an officer can put aside their biases and treat others fairly according to the law. The overwhelming majority of police officers throughout the land prove each and every day that they can.
The problem with the parents’ advice to their children is that they presume only officers, particularly White police officers, have such biases. The video doesn’t once show them telling their children that all of us, regardless of race, have prejudices. Their parents never bother to suggest that even Blacks have strong racial biases, including hatred for those of other racial groups. This is because Blacks are taught the silly notion that they cannot be racist because they lack the structural and societal power to be this way.
The parents also assume that Blacks in America are only stopped because of the ‘color of their skin.’ This too is a short-sighted understanding of things. Blacks still don’t understand that their biggest problem is not the color of their skin, but the ‘content of their character.’
Blacks, like most White liberals, want the suspicion they receive from the general public and the ‘harassment’ they receive from police to be about skin color for one simple reason: If people can be focused on skin color, they’re less likely to see ‘content of character.’ In other words, Blacks would rather have us all preoccupied with skin color issues so that they are not confronted about their actions, the way they conduct themselves, and character issues which the greater majority fail miserably at.
The video is another attempt on the part of America’s Blacks to avoid and obfuscate the real matter before us – namely, that Blacks are held in great suspicion by the police because so much violent crime is committed by them. Until Blacks in America collectively awaken to the reality that they themselves are the real problem – something they will never do – all of society will continue to look at them skeptically and harbor the worst but truthful opinions of them.
American Blacks can continue to believe in lies if they wish, but race-conscious Whites will not and can no longer afford to do so.